Sivaji Hi-tek Foods Private Limited vs. Deputy Commissioner (St) And Others
(Madras High Court, Tamilnadu)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Sivaji Hi-tek Foods Private Limited
Respondent
Deputy Commissioner (St) And Others
Court
Madras High Court
State
Tamilnadu
Date
Aug 31, 2021
Order No.
W.P.Nos.17501, 17504, 17505 & 17507 of 2021 And W.M.P.Nos.18596, 18598, 18600 & 18601 of 2021
TR Citation
2021 (8) TR 4627
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

Read this in conjunction with and in continuation of earlier proceedings made in previous listing on 23.08.2021 which reads as follows:

‘Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel for writ petitioner in all captioned writ petitions is before this Virtual Court.

2. The short point in these writ petitions turns on obtaining position that unbranded rice is an exempted commodity, but branded rice is taxable.

3. Writ petitioner-Assessee which has sold rice in gunny bags has not filed annexure along with returns. According to learned counsel for writ petitioner, filing of annexure is likely to affect the rights of the writ petitioner in rectification proceedings qua trademark.

4. However, in aforementioned scenario, this Court is of the view that it is necessary for this Court to have the benefit of seeing screen shots of both sides of gunny bags in which rice was sold. This Court is informed that the rice was sold in 5 kgs, 10 kgs and 25 kgs gunny bags.

5. Let the screen shots of the same be placed before this Court in the next listing.

6. List one week hence. List in the motion list on 31.08.2021.’

2. Pursuant to the aforesaid proceedings, captioned four writ petitions have been listed in the Admission Board today, Mr.N.Murali, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner in all four writ petitions and Mr.T.N.C.Kaushik, learned Revenue counsel for respondents in all four writ petitions are before this Virtual Court.

3. Learned counsel for writ petitioner has sent a email to the Registry together with a common memo (common memo in four writ petitions) and letter from writ petitioner, scanned reproduction of which are as follows:

4. Learned counsel on record for writ petitioner reiterates the contents of the aforementioned memo in the Virtual Court today.

5. In the light of the reiteration, captioned Writ Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

Please Wait
  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • sivaji hi tek foods private limited vs deputy commissioner st and others madras high court

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096