Prakashsinh Hathisinh Udavat vs. State Of Gujarat
(Gujarat High Court, Gujrat)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Prakashsinh Hathisinh Udavat
Respondent
State Of Gujarat
Court
Gujarat High Court
State
Gujrat
Date
Sep 27, 2019
Order No.
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 15365 of 2019
TR Citation
2019 (9) TR 2002
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

1. This petition challenges the order of seizure dated 25.10.2018 passed by Shri B.B. Pandor, Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (1) (Enforcement), Division-1, Ahmedabad whereby the vehicle of the petitioner bearing No.GJ-01-RX-0477 and two phones have been seized. Such order of seizure has been made in exercise of power under sub-section (2) of section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act/ Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

2. A perusal of the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 67 of the Act reveals that the same envisages authorisation by an officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner where he forms and opinion that the goods liable to confiscation or any documents or books or things, which in his opinion shall be useful for or relevant to any proceedings under the Act, are secreted in any place.

3. In the present case, a perusal of the impugned order shows that the details of the premises are Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ahmedabad, namely, the State Tax Office.

4. The learned Assistant Government Pleader upon a perusal of the record of the case is not in a position to point out any authorisation having been issued by a person not below the rank of Joint Commissioner for carrying out search in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 67 of the CGST/ GGST Act, 2017.

5. Under the circumstances, the impugned action of the said Officer appears to be totally without any authority of law. Moreover, since the details of the premises as stated in the impugned order is Rajya Kar Bhavan, Ahmedabad, it is manifest that no officer would permit search on such premises in accordance with the powers under sub-section (2) of section 67 of the CGST/ GGST Act, 2017.

6. In view of the above, Shri B.B. Pandor, Assistant Commissioner of State Tax (1) (Enforcement), Division-1, Ahmedabad shall be joined as respondent No.4 in these proceedings.

7. Issue Notice to the newly joined respondent to explain as to under what circumstances and in exercise of which powers he has issued the impugned order dated 25.10.2018, returnable on 10th October, 2019.

8. Registry to forthwith forward a copy of this order to the concerned Officer.

  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • prakashsinh hathisinh udavat vs state of gujarat high court order gujrat 2002

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096