Raj Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Enforcement) , Challakere
(Karnataka High Court, Karnataka)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Raj Enterprises
Respondent
Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes (Enforcement) , Challakere
Court
Karnataka High Court
State
Karnataka
Date
Jul 30, 2019
Order No.
WRIT PETITION NOS.31111-31112 OF 2019 (T-RES)
TR Citation
2019 (7) TR 2018
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

In the instant petitions, petitioner has sought for the following relief:

a. Set aside/quash the impugned order of detention under Section 129 (1) of KGST/CGST and IGST Act dated 08.07.2019 in GST MOV-06 as per Annexure-A; impugned notice dated 23.7.2019 issued by respondent under Section 129(3) of the KGST/CGST and IGST Act bearing No.ACCT/ENF/CLK/K-15/2019-20 as per Annexure-A1 as it is passed without jurisdiction by issuing a writ of certiorari or any other order or writ in the nature of a writ of certiorari and direct the respondent by issuance of writ of mandamus to forthwith release the detained goods and goods conveyance No.DL01GC5983.

Or in the alternative

b. Set aside/quash the impugned order of detention under Section 129 (1) of KGST/CGST and IGST Act dated 08.07.2019 in GST MOV-06 as per Annexure-A; impugned notice dated 23.7.2019 issued by respondent under Section 129(3) of the KGST/CGST and IGST Act bearing No.ACCT/ENF/CLK/K-15/2019-20 as per Annexure – A1 by issuing a writ of certiorari and direct the respondent by issuance of writ of mandamus to forthwith release the detained goods and goods conveyance bearing No.dl01GC5983 and conduct the entire proceedings afresh, if need be, in accordance with law, by providing all the incriminating materials, if any and a fair and sufficient opportunity of being heard.

2. At threshold, writ petitions are premature without giving breathing time for the respondent, petitioner has rushed to this Court.

3. Of course, petitioner has submitted explanation to the summons on 8.7.2019. The respondents have issued an endorsement asking certain information and documents relating to ownership of goods. The petitioner is stated to have submitted its explanation along with documents. In this regard, matter is pending consideration before the authority.

4. Petitioner is permitted to file additional explanation, if any, within a period of ten days from today on receipt of additional explanation of the petitioner concerned, authority is hereby directed to pass speaking order and communicate the same at the earliest since seized materials are stated to be perishable goods. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four weeks from today.

With the above observation, writ petitions stand disposed off.

  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • raj enterprises vs assistant commissioner of commercial taxes enforcement challakere high court order karnataka 2018

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096