Vinita Gupta vs. The State Of Bihar And Other
(Patna High Court, Bihar)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Vinita Gupta
Respondent
The State Of Bihar And Other
Court
Patna High Court
State
Bihar
Date
Sep 30, 2021
Order No.
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16888 of 2021
TR Citation
2021 (9) TR 4738
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

“1(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or directions(s) in the nature of writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order cum demand notice dated 11.01.2021 (Annexure- 3) passed by the respondent Assistant Commissioner of State Tax under Section 74 of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as ‘the BGST Act, 2017 only) read with Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as ‘the CGST Act, 2017 only’) for the periods October 2019 to March 2020 by which ₹ 4,31,690.80 has been assessed as tax, ₹ 58, 278.26 has been assessed as interest and ₹ 4,31,690.80 has been imposed as penalty. Thus, total liability of ₹ 9,21,659.86 has been created.

(ii) For issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing the ex parte appellate order dated 05.07.2021 passed by the respondent Appellate Authority that is Additional Commissioner State Tax, Purnea Division, Purnea by which appeal filed by the petitioner has been rejected without considering the time petition filed by the petitioner as well as grounds of appeal mentioned in the appeal filed before him which is violation of principle of natural justice.

(iii) For issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from initiating any recovery proceedings against the petitioner as demanded by the respondents by the aforesaid demand notice.

(iv) For issuance of appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondents from taking or initiating any coercive action against the petitioner and or its agents/officials etc, and

(v) To grant such other consequential relief(s) to the petitioner, which this Hon’ble Court may find the petitioner to be entitled to in equity and/or in law in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

It is brought to our notice that vide impugned order dated 05.07.2021 (Annexure-7) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Purnea Division, Purnea in Appeal No. (ARN) AD100421000881X, the appeal of the petitioner against the order dated 11.01.2021 (Annexure-3) passed by respondent no.3, namely the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Katihar-Purnea, Bihar in GST No. 10BDUPG7802C1ZX has been rejected, without following the principles of natural justice. We are informed that the appeal through electronic mode stood filed by the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the Revenue, states that he has no objection if the matter is remanded to the Appellate Authority for deciding the appeal afresh. Also, while considering and deciding the appeal, the ground of delay shall not be taken into account and the appeal shall be decided on merits. Also, during pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner. Statement accepted and taken on record.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties as also perused the record made available, we dispose of the present petition in the following mutually agreeable terms:-

(a) We quash and set aside the impugned order dated 05.07.2021 (Annexure-7) passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Purnea Division, Purnea (Respondent No. 2) in Appeal No. (ARN) AD100421000881X;

(b) The appeal is restored to its original file and number;

(c) We accept the statement of the petitioner that ten per cent of the total amount, being condition prerequisite for hearing of the appeal, already stands deposited. If that were so, the appeal shall be decided on merits. However, if the amount is not deposited for whatever reason(s), same shall be done before the next date;

(d) This deposit shall be without prejudice to the respective rights and contention of the parties and subject to the order passed by the Appellate Authority. However, if it is ultimately found that the petitioner’s deposit is in excess, the same shall be refunded within two months from the date of passing of the order;  

(e) We also direct for de-freezing/de-attaching of the bank account(s) of the writ-petitioner, if attached in reference to the proceedings, subject matter of present petition. This shall be done immediately.

(f) Petitioner undertakes to appear before the Appellate Authority i.e. Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Purnea Division, Purnea (Respondent No. 2) on 28th of October, 2021 at 10:30 A.M., if possible through digital mode;

(g) The Appellate Authority shall condone the delay, if any, in filing the appeal and decide the appeal on merits after complying with the principles of natural justice;

(h) Opportunity of hearing shall be afforded to the parties to place on record all essential documents and materials, if so required and desired;

(i) During pendency of the appeal, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioner.

(j) The Appellate Authority shall pass a fresh order only after affording adequate opportunity to all concerned, including the writ petitioner;  

(k) Petitioner through learned counsel undertakes to fully cooperate in such proceedings and not take unnecessary adjournment;

(l) The Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal on merits expeditiously, preferably within a period of two months from the date of appearance of the petitioner;

(m) The Appellate Authority shall pass a speaking order assigning reasons, copy whereof shall be supplied to the parties;

(n) Liberty reserved to the petitioner to challenge the order, if required and desired;

(o) Equally, liberty reserved to the parties to take recourse to such other remedies as are otherwise available in accordance with law;

(p) We are hopeful that as and when petitioner takes recourse to such remedies, before the appropriate forum, the same shall be dealt with, in accordance with law, with a reasonable dispatch;

(q) We have not expressed any opinion on merits and all issues are left open;

(r) If possible, proceedings during the time of current Pandemic [Covid-19] be conducted through digital mode;

The instant petition sands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

Learned counsel for the respondents undertakes to communicate the order to the appropriate authority through electronic mode.

Please Wait
  • Home
  • /
  • CAselaw
  • /
  • vinita gupta vs the state of bihar and other patna high court

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096