Chavan Autowheels Pvt. Ltd., M/S Chavan Motor Div. (I) , Pvt. Ltd. vs. The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
(Bombay High Court, Maharashtra)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Chavan Autowheels Pvt. Ltd., M/S Chavan Motor Div. (I) , Pvt. Ltd.
Respondent
The State Of Maharashtra And Ors.
Court
Bombay High Court
State
Maharashtra
Date
Feb 8, 2019
Order No.
WRIT PETITION NO.713 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.716 OF 2019
TR Citation
2019 (2) TR 2386
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

1 After this matter was heard for some time, firstly our attention was invited by Mr. Jetly appearing for respondent Nos.3 to 6 at page 41 of the memo of writ petition No.713 of 2019 and at page 47 of the memo of writ petition No.716 of 2019, which is a communication to the petitioner from none other than the Deputy Commissioner to GST Council, New Delhi.

2. This communication reads as under:

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA

GOODS AND SERVICES TAX COUNCIL

F.No.188/Representations on GST/GSTC/2017/Pt./2461

5th Floor, Tower-II, Jeevan Bharti Bldg

Connaught Circus, New Delhi

Dated :26.11.2018

To

M/s Chavan Auto Wheels Pvt. Ltd. 1147, A/P Kumbhari, Akkalkot Road, Solapur – 413006

Sub : Form GST TRAN-1 not filed due to technical erroe during submission of the form-reg.

I am directed to refer your letter dated 19.10.2018 on the above subject and to inform that a IT-grievance redressal mechanism is set up in terms of a Circular No.39/13/2018-GST dated 03.04.2018 issued by CBIC.

Accordingly, you may file your IT related grievance through field officer or nodal officer of your jurisdiction, for consideration of your grievance by IT-Grievance Redressal Committee.

Hence your letter dated 19.10.2018 is returned herewith, in original.

(Arjun Kumar Meena)

Deputy Commissioner to GST Council

Encl : As above.

3. Then, Mr. Jetly says that this is possibly not a grievance against the Central machinery, but the State GST Officials.

4. In that regard, we find that respondent No.2 to these petitions is the Commissioner of State Tax.

5. On an oral query, Ms. Shruti Vyas appearing for respondent Nos.1,2 and 7 took instructions from the official present in the Court and says that respondent Nos.1, 2 and 7 will ensure that the Commissioner, second respondent, meets the petitioner or its representatives on Monday i.e. 11th February, 2018 at 11.30 a.m. and will ensure that the petitioner’s grievances are redressed.

6. We post this matter for “Passing Orders” on 14th February, 2018.

  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • chavan autowheels pvt ltd m s chavan motor div i pvt ltd vs the state of maharashtra and ors bombay high court

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096