Dev Indus Paints Rep. By Its Proprietor K. Revathy vs. The Commissioner (Ct) , Commercial Taxes Department And The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
(Madras High Court, Tamilnadu)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Dev Indus Paints Rep. By Its Proprietor K. Revathy
Respondent
The Commissioner (Ct) , Commercial Taxes Department And The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Court
Madras High Court
State
Tamilnadu
Date
Jul 9, 2018
Order No.
Writ Petition No.17029 of 2018 & WMP.No.20280 of 2018
TR Citation
2018 (7) TR 2904
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

Mr.J.Kumaran, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. Heard both. By consent, the writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal.

2. The petitioner has challenged a show cause notice dated 16.1.2018 and the consequential attachment of the bank account for recovery of tax and penalty in the assessment orders for the years from 2015-16 to 2017- 18.

3. The first contention raised by the learned counsel for the petitioner is that no assessment order has been passed and communicated to the petitioner so far as the three relevant assessment years are concerned and that the last assessment, which was made, was only for the year 2014-15.

4. Other contentions have also been raised with regard to the validity of the impugned notice invoking the provisions of the Puducherry Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

5. However, this Court considered the first ground and directed the learned Government Advocate to verify and report as to whether any assessment orders have been passed in respect of the relevant years. The learned Government Advocate, on instructions from the officer, who is present in court, has informed that the assessment orders have not been passed in respect of all the three relevant assessment years. Then, there cannot be a demand notice nor there can be any attachment of the petitioner’s bank account.

6. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed, the impugned notice is set aside and Form U notice issued to the petitioner’s banker is also set aside. Consequently, there will be a direction to the respondents to return the cheques collected from the petitioner. This direction shall be complied with within 3 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. After the cheques are returned, the respondents are directed to issue pre-revision notices to the petitioner for all the three assessment years, grant reasonable opportunity to submit objections, afford an opportunity of personal hearing and complete the assessments in accordance with law. No costs.

Consequently, the connected WMP is closed.

Please Wait
  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • dev indus paints rep by its proprietor k revathy vs the commissioner ct commercial taxes department and the deputy commercial tax officer madras high court

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096