PROCEEDINGS
Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 2017 and the Maharashtra
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by E-SQUARE LEISURE PVT LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :
– Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest if any?
– In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for levy of GST?
At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provision under the MGST Act. Further to the earlier, henceforth for the purposes of this Advance Ruling, a reference to such a similar provision under the CGST Act / MGST Act would be mentioned as being under the “GST Act”.
02. FACTS AND CONTENTION – AS PER THE APPLICANT
The submissions, as reproduced verbatim, could be seen thus-
STATEMENT OF THE RELEVANT FACTS HA VING A BEARING ON THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANCE RULING IS REQUIRED.
– Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest if any?
– In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for levy of GST?
2.1 STATEMENT CONTAINING THE APPLICANT’S INTERPRETATION OF LAW AND/OR FACTS, AS THE CASE MAY BE, IN RESPECT OF THE QUESTION(S) ON WHICH THE ADVANC RULING IS REQUIRED
1. ISSUE FOR DETERMINATION–
2. OUR SUBMISSIONS –
Deposit not affects the rent payable and not liable for GST
(a) all forms of supply of goods or services or both such as sale, transfer, barter, exchange, licence, rental, lease or disposal made or agreed to be made for a consideration by a person in the course or furtherance of business.
Further, we refers to proviso to sub-section 31 of section 2 of the Central Gods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter to be referred ‘CGST Act’) as follows –
(31) “Consideration” in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes
(a)……
(b)……..
Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply;
[Emphasis supplied] –
As per above, it is clear that ‘consideration’ has been defined to include all monetary payments and promises, and the monetary value of any acts, promised to be made by the receiver of the supply of goods or services, or both, to the provider. The proviso explains as to when ‘deposits’ will form part of consideration, and hence, forms part of value of the supply and consequentially get taxed.
Notional interest provision not existing in the GST law –
Explanation 2 – Where an assessee receives any advance payment from the buyer against delivery of any excisable goods, no notional interest on such advance shall be added to the value unless the Central Excise Officer has evidence to the effect that the advance received has influenced the fixation of the price of the goods by way of charging a lesser price from or by offering a special discount to the buyer who has made the advance deposit.
“The practice of taking security deposit for the premises rented out on lease basis is common throughout the country and the amount of security deposit taken also varies from place to place and also depends on the property, whether it is for commercial or residential purpose. There is no evidence available on record led by the Revenue to show that the notional interest on the interest free security deposit has influenced the consideration received for renting and it is only a presumption on the part of the revenue. Therefore, the ratio of the Apex Court decision in the case of ISPL Industries Ltd. (2003 (4) TMI 99 – SUPREME COURT OF INDIA) would apply. Accordingly, we are; prima facie, of the view that the appellant has made out a case in their favour for grant of stay. Accordingly, we grant unconditional waiver from pre-deposit of dues adjudged against the appellant and stay recovery thereof during the pendency of the appeal.”
Alternate school of thought – Deposit affects the rent payable and liable for GST
PRAYER
In view of the submissions made above, it is most humbly prayed that Hon’ble authorities may kindly pass advance ruling to clarify:
– Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest if
– In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for levy of GST?
03. CONTENTION – AS PER THE CONCERNED OFFICE
The written contention submitted by the concerned officer on this issues is as under,
Issue on which advance ruling is sought are-
Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest, if any?
In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for value of GST?
submission as departmental authority:
As per definition of consideration in section 2, sub-section 31 of MGST Act 2017, deposit does not form part of consideration, unless adjusted against consideration.
As per terms and conditions of copy of agreement produced by lessor and copy of Order by Stamp Duty authority, lessor has determined the rent at market value. Lessor has also made provision for increase in rent at fixed time schedule. Free refundable deposit does not provide for any additional consideration to the lessor.
Therefore, interest/ notional interest on security deposit received by the lessor is not liable to GST.
04. HEARING
The Preliminary hearing in the matter was held on 05.12.2018, Ms. Vaishali Kharde, C.A. and Ms. Shruti Gulecha C.A. appeared and made oral and written submissions for admission of application as per detailed contentions made in their ARA submissions. Jurisdictional Officer Ms. Kiran Sonawane was not present at the time of the Preliminary Hearing.
The final hearing in the matter was held on 18.12.2018 Sh. Pritam Mahure, C.A., along with Ms. Vaishali Kharde, C.A. appeared and made arguments on submissions. Jurisdictional Officer Ms. Kiran Sonawane, Dy. Commr. of S.T.(E-201), Pune appeared and submitted their contention. We heard from both the parties during the course of the hearing.
05. OBSERVATIONS
We have gone through the facts of the case, oral and written submissions made by the applicant as well as the jurisdictional officer & the applicable provisions of the GST laws in this regard. Few facts relevant for the present purpose those are as follows:
Applicant is engaged in supply of various services including renting of immovable property to business entities for commercial purpose. The Applicant is discharging liability under the provisions of GST Act on the amount rent received from the lessee. Applicant has taken security deposit from the lessee as security against damages to property such as furniture, fittings attached with the property or any damage to the property leased. The security deposit is free from any interest payable to lessee that is Interest Free Security Deposit. This interest free security deposit is the central point of this application and applicant seek clarification on the levy of GST on such deposits. Applicant has raised following questions:
1. Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest if any?
2. In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for levy of GST?
Thus, the issue for our consideration in this application is the leviability of GST on interest free deposit and notional interest ‘if any’. The taxable event in GST is supply of goods of services or both. The term ‘supply’ is inclusive in nature can be understood in terms of following parameters namely:-
1. Supply of goods or services. Supply of anything other than goods or services does not attract GST.
2. Supply should be made for a consideration.
3. Supply should be made in the course or furtherance of business.
4. SuppIy should be made by a taxable person.
5. Supply should be a taxable supply.
Besides above parameters, GST Laws have provided certain exceptions to the requirement of supply being made for consideration and in the course of furtherance of business.
We therefore have to find whether the security deposit taken from lessee on account of security against damages, if any, caused to the furniture, equipment’s, fittings supplied along with the premises or any damage constitute consideration is vis a vis any supply under the provisions of GST Act. Section 2(31) defines the term consideration as following:-
(31) “consideration” in relation to the supply of goods or services or both includes-
(a) any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government;
(b) the monetary value of any act or forbearance, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by the recipient or by any other person but shall not include any subsidy given by the Central Government or a State Government:
Provided that a deposit given in respect of the supply of goods or services or both shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier applies such deposit as consideration for the said supply;
The definition of consideration is inclusive and the consideration may be in cash or kind. The payment received will not be treated as consideration, if there is no direct link between the payment and supply. From the close scrutiny of above definition it is clear that there should be a close nexus between the payment and supply and thus any payment/exchange/barter etc would be treated as consideration for supply and liable to GST. Prima facie a conclusion can be drawn without much difficulty that a deposit given in respect of the supply shall not be considered as payment made for such supply unless the supplier appropriates such deposit as consideration for the said supply.
In view of the above we take up the subject matter for discussion. The term deposit is not defined in the GST Act. From the perusal of Dictionary meaning deposit has several dimension that include part or full price of the purchase, sum money paid into a bank account, a sum you pay when you start a renting something etc. Thus for a payment to be considered as security deposit should have following attributes
i) For performance of an obligation.
ii) Security against return of the hired goods.
iii) Security against damage to properties rented.
iv) Must be reasonable.
Applying the above test to the facts of the case we find that, the security deposit taken by the applicant is to secure or to act as a guarantee as per the terms of agreement against damages to the properties. Further, admittedly applicant has taken security deposit against the damages caused to the furniture, equipment’s, fittings supplied along with the premises or damage done to the properties. The undisputed fact is that the amount of deposit taken by the applicant is Rupees Fifty Seven Crore for the period of 18 years. We find, as per the submissions made by the applicant and the facts of the matter as stated by them, the applicant will not apply such deposit received, as consideration for the said supply and therefore the provision to Section 2 (31) will not be applicable to this matter. Thus we find that in the subject case, the deposit received by the applicant cannot be treated as consideration for the supply made by the applicant and therefore they will not be liable to pay GST on such deposit amount received by them.
To sum up, we find that the applicant, for leasing of commercial property has, in addition to rent, also collected interest free deposit from their lessee which is returnable on the completion of the tenure of the lease. Since the entire amount is to be returned back to their lessee, such deposits cannot be considered as consideration for such supply of services as mentioned by them and hence will not be liable to tax.
However at the time of completion of the lease tenure, if the entire deposit or a part of it is withheld and not paid back, as a charge against damages, etc. then at that stage such amounts not returned back will be liable to GST as per the present GST laws.
06. In view of the deliberations as held hereinabove, we pass an order as follows:
ORDER
(Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017)
NO.GST-ARA-76/2018-19/B-172
Mumbai, dt. 29-12-2018
For reasons as discussed in the body of the order, the questions are answered thus –
Question :- Whether GST would be applicable on interest free security deposit and notional interest if any?
Answer :- In view of above discussion, GST is not applicable on interest free security deposit.
Question :- In case GST is applicable what would be value of notional interest for levy of GST?
Answer:- Not Answered in view of answer to question no. 01 above.