(1) The secured creditor along with receiver has approached this Court aggrieved against the action of the respondents in detaining the mortgaged vehicle, which was moved from one place to the other for taking effective physical possession of the vehicle in compliance of the order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal. It is contended that such movement would not be covered under the element of “supply” covered under the GST Scheme.

(2) At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition in order to challenge the subsequent order passed under Section 129(3) of the HGST Act.

(3) The writ petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with aforementioned liberty.