Learned counsel for the petitioner s Mr. Kartik Kurmy appear s along with Mr. Nitin Kumar Pasari and Ms. Sidhi Jalan, Advocates

2. Mr. P. S. Pati, learned counsel for the CGST appears along with Mrs. Ranjana Mukherjee, advocate in both the cases.

3. At the outset, it has been pointed out by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties that pursuant to the order dated 2.09.2021, appropriate order has been passed and an affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondent CGST, wherein, at para 5, it has been specifically mentioned as follows:

“That the answering respondents state that the order up on the application of the petitioner has been passed on 3.09.2021 and the attachment order has been recalled.”

4. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the parties that since the order of attachment is common in connection with both the writ petitions, only one affidavit has been filed in W.P (T) No. 1163 of 2021 mentioning about recall of the order of attachment of bank account of both the petitioners

5. From perusal of writ petitions, it appears that the cause of action for filing the present c a se s arose out of order of attachment being C. No. V(30)50/Prev/Navya/Ran(2020/ dated 11.01.2021 issued by Deputy Commissioner (CGST & CX, Ranchi annexed along with both the writ petitions as Annexure 4, relating to the writ petitioners in both the cases. In view of the subsequent development which has been taken place during the pendency of writ petitions, i.e., the aforesaid attachment order it self having been recalled with respect of the writ petitioners, nothing survives in the present writ petitions

6. Accordingly, these writ petition s are disposed of.