Thomas Mount Cum Pallavaram Cantonment Board & Others vs. The Additional Director & Others
(Madras High Court, Tamilnadu)

Case Law
Petitioner / Applicant
Thomas Mount Cum Pallavaram Cantonment Board & Others
Respondent
The Additional Director & Others
Court
Madras High Court
State
Tamilnadu
Date
Nov 21, 2022
Order No.
W.A. No. 2524 of 2022
TR Citation
2022 (11) TR 6659
Related HSN Chapter/s
N/A
Related HSN Code
N/A

ORDER

JUDGMENT

The present writ appeal has been preferred as against the order dated 10.08.2022 in W.P. No. 28468 of 2021.

2. In the said writ petition, the appellant/writ petitioner, who was issued with summons dated 16.06.2022 by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Madurai Regional Unit, had sought a mandamus forbearing the respondents therein from proceeding with the investigation with regard to Goods and Services Tax under the provisions of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 . It is the specific case of the appellant/writ petitioner both before the learned Single Judge and also before us, that the appellant is located in ChennaI and all its properties are also only in Chennai. Therefore, there is no territorial nexus between the appellant and the respondent Officers at Coimbatore or Madurai.

3. Learned Standing counsel for the respondent would submit that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is well-reasoned and does not call for any interference and therefore, prays for dismissal of the writ appeal. That apart, it is submitted that the issue is covered by the order of this Court dated 17.06.2022 in W.P. No. 12583 of 2020 etc ( M/s. Reddington (India) Pvt. Limited V. The Additional Director General, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Chennai Zonal Unit ) rendered by one of us (CSNJ). Therefore, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondents would submit that respondents 1 & 2 in this writ appeal, who are also respondents 1 and 2 in the writ petition, are competent to summon the appellant/writ petitioner.

4. We have considered the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.

5. We are of the view that though the officer from the Intelligence Department of Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence is competent to investigate into the affairs of the appellant, the officer, who would be competent to investigate would be the officer, who is stationed in Chennai within whose jurisdiction the appellant is located.

6. Considering the above, we are inclined to allow this writ appeal. Accordingly, the writ appeal stands allowed with a direction to the respondents to depute an officer in Chennai to investigate into the affairs of the appellant and issue summons as to whether there is any evasion of tax under the provisions of respective GST enactments, 2017. No costs.

Please Wait
  • Home
  • /
  • caselaw
  • /
  • thomas mount cum pallavaram cantonment board others vs the additional director others high court order tamilnadu 6659

BUSY is a simple, yet powerful GST / VAT compliant Business Accounting Software that has everything you need to grow your business.

phone Sales & Support:

+91 82 82 82 82 82
+91 11 - 4096 4096